Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> An easy fix for that is to allow this form of COPY to return text[]
>> instead of a fixed number of text columns.
> I'd like to see some concrete syntax suggestions for such an animal.
I think there were some in the previous discussion --- it came down
to using a SRF with arguments that specify the copy source and options.
Setting the result type as text[] instead of some has-to-be-specified
composite type should actually make it a bit easier.
regards, tom lane
