Re: Extensions, this time with a patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Extensions, this time with a patch
Date
Msg-id 6232.1287237560@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Extensions, this time with a patch  (Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>)
Responses Re: Extensions, this time with a patch  (Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>)
List pgsql-hackers
Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr> writes:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
>> The other problem is that it's slurping the whole file and executing it
>> as a single query.

> Given some advice, I'll rework that part too. The good news is that it's
> well separated from the rest of the extension's work.

I think that's something that could be left for later, if not never.
I find it hard to imagine extension modules with more than a few
thousand commands (the largest one in contrib is isn, with about 500).
No modern machine is going to have the slightest difficulty with that.
If it ever does get to be a problem in practice, we could rework the
implementation at that time.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Is LISTEN/NOTIFY reliable?
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Is LISTEN/NOTIFY reliable?