Re: pgsql: Cleanup comments/docs around the new shmem request callbacks - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Erik Rijkers
Subject Re: pgsql: Cleanup comments/docs around the new shmem request callbacks
Date
Msg-id 6223b7dc-bfee-fcff-88d9-13f99b8d4897@xs4all.nl
Whole thread
List pgsql-hackers
Op 7/7/26 om 21:40 schreef Heikki Linnakangas:
> Cleanup comments/docs around the new shmem request callbacks
> 
> Make it explicit in the docs that the shmem initialization callbacks
> are called while holding ShmemIndexLock.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>
> Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAExHW5sHs+eSiTDOd14buayc6JbBX=Hm5ssFMBK0Ki9sTGEOuA@mail.gmail.com
> Backpatch-through: 19
> 
> Branch
> ------
> REL_19_STABLE
> 
> Details
> -------
> https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/a53d6d8aea8fe703d86dd2bdc0a3d86800eca7c3
> 
> Modified Files
> --------------
> doc/src/sgml/xfunc.sgml         | 4 ++--

Hi,

in doc/src/sgml/xfunc.sgml

the sentence:
   "two backends trying to initializing the memory area"

should be:
   "two backends trying to initialize the memory area"

Thanks,


Erik


> src/backend/storage/ipc/shmem.c | 7 +++++--
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: Support EXCEPT for ALL SEQUENCES publications
Next
From: "cca5507"
Date:
Subject: Re: Do not lock tables in get_tables_to_repack