Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks
Date
Msg-id 6202.1028427326@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: FUNC_MAX_ARGS benchmarks  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> OK, time to get moving folks.  Looks like the increase in the function
> args to 32 and the NAMEDATALEN to 128 has been sufficiently tested.

I'm convinced by Joe's numbers that FUNC_MAX_ARGS = 32 shouldn't hurt
too much.  But have we done equivalent checks on NAMEDATALEN?  In
particular, do we know what it does to the size of template1?
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: PITR, checkpoint, and local relations
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: getpid() function