Re: Any objections to implementing LogicalDecodeMessageCB for pgoutput? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Euler Taveira
Subject Re: Any objections to implementing LogicalDecodeMessageCB for pgoutput?
Date
Msg-id 61e35b37-22cb-4565-be80-9c52c5e2f3a3@www.fastmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Any objections to implementing LogicalDecodeMessageCB for pgoutput?  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Any objections to implementing LogicalDecodeMessageCB for pgoutput?  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Apr 5, 2021, at 4:06 AM, Amit Kapila wrote:
I have made few minor changes in the attached. (a) Initialize the
streaming message callback API, (b) update docs to reflect that XID
can be sent for streaming of in-progress transactions, I see that the
same information needs to be updated for a few other protocol message
but we can do that as a separate patch (c) slightly tweaked the commit
messages
Good catch. I completely forgot the streaming of in progress transactions. I
agree that the documentation for transaction should be added as a separate
patch since the scope is beyond this feature.


--
Euler Taveira

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Sait Talha Nisanci
Date:
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Crash in record_type_typmod_compare
Next
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: Stronger safeguard for archive recovery not to miss data