On 08.09.22 11:26, Aleksander Alekseev wrote:
>>> 3. Go with your patch and just fix up the warnings about uninitialized
>>> variables. But that seems the least principled to me.
>>
>> IMO the 3rd option is the lesser evil. Initializing four bools/ints in
>> order to make Clang 11 happy doesn't strike me as such a big deal. At
>> least until somebody reports a bottleneck for this particular reason.
>> We can optimize the code when and if this will happen.
>
> Since the first patch was applied, cfbot now complains that it can't
> apply the patchset. Here is the rebased version.
committed, thanks
