Re: [PATCH] New [relation] option engine - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Yura Sokolov
Subject Re: [PATCH] New [relation] option engine
Date
Msg-id 61ac1e3b-4f85-4bd5-b2fa-80cc7e864755@postgrespro.ru
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] New [relation] option engine  (John Naylor <johncnaylorls@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] New [relation] option engine
List pgsql-hackers
11.11.2023 12:33, John Naylor пишет:
> On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 10:03 AM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 1 Feb 2023 at 14:49, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2023-Jan-31, vignesh C wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 3 Jan 2023 at 18:38, vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>>>> There has been no updates on this thread for some time, so this has
>>>> been switched as Returned with Feedback. Feel free to open it in the
>>>> next commitfest if you plan to continue on this.
>>>
>>> Well, no feedback has been given, so I'm not sure this is a great
>>> outcome.  In the interest of keeping it alive, I've rebased it.  It
>>> turns out that the only conflict is with the 2022 -> 2023 copyright line
>>> update.
>>>
>>> I have not reviewed it.
>>
>> Since there was no response to rebase the patch, I was not sure if the
>> author was planning to continue. Anyways Nikolay Shaplov plans to work
>> on this soon, So I have added this to the next commitfest at [1].
>> [1] - https://commitfest.postgresql.org/41/3536/
> 
> Nine months have passed, and there hasn't been an update since last
> time it was returned. It doesn't seem to have been productive to
> resurrect it to the CF based on "someone plans to work on it soon".
> I'm re-returning it with feedback.
> 
> Some time ago, there was a proposal to create a new category "lack of
> interest", but that also seems to have gone nowhere because of...lack
> of interest.

I've rebased patch, so it could be add to commitfest again.

------
Yura Sokolov

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ashutosh Bapat
Date:
Subject: Re: Memory consumed by paths during partitionwise join planning
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Make COPY format extendable: Extract COPY TO format implementations