On Fri, 2022-01-14 at 10:49 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 02:52:12PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Probably none of this should have been back-patched --- the issues
> > are not so large that they require a risk of breaking things in
> > the back branches.
>
> Agreed, that's not worth breaking things in v14, so I'll go and revert
> this stuff in it.
Thanks!
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
