Re: updated hstore patch - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David E. Wheeler
Subject Re: updated hstore patch
Date
Msg-id 612B0BCF-2239-4655-8D8B-5BD5BDFDE43E@kineticode.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: updated hstore patch  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: updated hstore patch
List pgsql-hackers
On Sep 20, 2009, at 8:43 AM, Tom Lane wrote:

>> If the perfect solution is too complex, I'd also kinda hope this  
>> isn't a
>> show-stopper for this patch, but rather a TODO for the future  
>> modules feature.
>
> Yeah, this is a long-standing generic issue, and not really hstore's
> problem to fix.

So then does there need to be some documentation for how to deal with  
this, for those doing an in-place upgrade from an existing hstore data  
type? Or would that discussion be in Bruce's tool's docs?

Best,

David


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "David E. Wheeler"
Date:
Subject: Re: updated hstore patch
Next
From: "David E. Wheeler"
Date:
Subject: Re: updated hstore patch