Re: TB-sized databases - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: TB-sized databases
Date
Msg-id 6126.1196992502@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: TB-sized databases  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-performance
I wrote:
> Hmm.  IIRC, there are smarts in there about whether a mergejoin can
> terminate early because of disparate ranges of the two join variables.
> Seems like it should be straightforward to fix it to also consider
> whether the time-to-return-first-row will be bloated because of
> disparate ranges.

I've posted a proposed patch for this:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2007-12/msg00025.php

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Ron Mayer
Date:
Subject: Re: TB-sized databases
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: TB-sized databases