Re: automatically generating node support functions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: automatically generating node support functions
Date
Msg-id 611d2e93-6330-47fa-0970-72316aed50f2@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: automatically generating node support functions  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: automatically generating node support functions
List pgsql-hackers
On 08.07.22 15:52, Tom Lane wrote:
> I'll re-read the patch today, but how open are you to putting the
> struct attributes at the top?  I'm willing to do the legwork.

I agree near the top would be preferable.  I think it would even be 
feasible to parse the whole thing if pgindent split it across lines.  I 
sort of tried to maintain the consistency with C/C++ attributes like 
__attribute__ and [[attribute]], hoping that that would confuse other 
tooling the least.  Feel free to experiment further.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bharath Rupireddy
Date:
Subject: Re: Switching XLog source from archive to streaming when primary available
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: System catalog documentation chapter