Re: background triggers? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Chris Browne
Subject Re: background triggers?
Date
Msg-id 60k68b5voi.fsf@dba2.int.libertyrms.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to background triggers?  (Sim Zacks <sim@compulab.co.il>)
Responses Re: background triggers?
List pgsql-general
Sim Zacks <sim@compulab.co.il> writes:
> The reason why the client application would have to wait is because
> the front-end is written in MSAccess. While Windows supports multi
> threading, Access does not support multi threading.
> (Multi threading allows background processing, IYDK)

Well, you *clearly* need to have some sort of "daemon" running in
order to do this.

I expect it will in effect be a LISTEN process that waits for clients
to submit NOTIFY requests.

Even if you don't actually choose to use NOTIFY/LISTEN, per se, you'll
doubtless wind up creating an ad hoc, informally-specified
implementation of part of it...
--
let name="cbbrowne" and tld="ntlug.org" in name ^ "@" ^ tld;;
http://www.ntlug.org/~cbbrowne/unix.html
"Any sufficiently complicated C or Fortran program contains an ad hoc
informally-specified bug-ridden slow implementation of half of Common
Lisp."  -- Philip Greenspun

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Sim Zacks
Date:
Subject: Re: background triggers?
Next
From: Alban Hertroys
Date:
Subject: Re: [SQL] (Ab)Using schemas and inheritance