andrew@dunslane.net (Andrew Dunstan) writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> So in a roundabout way we come back
>> to the idea that we need a bug tracker (NOT a patch tracker), plus
>> people putting in the effort to make sure it stays a valid source
>> of up-to-date info. Without the latter it won't really be useful.
> Hallelujah Brother!
>
> BTW, a bug tracker can be used as a patch tracker, although the
> reverse isn't true. For example, the BZ people use BZ that way, in
> fact - most patches arrive as attachments to bugs. And trackers can be
> used just as well for tracking features as well as bugs.
Well, Command Prompt set up a Bugzilla instance specifically so people
could track PG bugs. If only someone took interest and started using
it...
--
"cbbrowne","@","linuxfinances.info"
http://cbbrowne.com/info/lisp.html
Do Roman paramedics refer to IV's as "4's"?
