Re: postgres_fdw: using TABLESAMPLE to collect remote sample - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tomas Vondra
Subject Re: postgres_fdw: using TABLESAMPLE to collect remote sample
Date
Msg-id 60c4dc7c-82e8-ab04-a938-d7b7c5ee75f0@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: postgres_fdw: using TABLESAMPLE to collect remote sample  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: postgres_fdw: using TABLESAMPLE to collect remote sample  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2/11/22 19:13, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 1:06 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> While I'm not opposed to moving those goalposts at some point,
>> I think pushing them all the way up to 9.5 for this one easily-fixed
>> problem is not very reasonable.
>>
>> Given other recent discussion, an argument could be made for moving
>> the cutoff to 9.2, on the grounds that it's too hard to test against
>> anything older.  But that still leaves us needing a version check
>> if we want to use TABLESAMPLE.
> 
> OK, thanks.
> 

Yeah, I think checking server_version is fairly simple. Which is mostly
why I haven't done anything about that in the submitted patch, because
the other issues (what fraction to sample) seemed more important.

regards

-- 
Tomas Vondra
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Joseph Koshakow
Date:
Subject: Fix overflow in DecodeInterval
Next
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: Replacing TAP test planning with done_testing()