Sun Involvements (was Re: [GENERAL] Oracle buys Innobase) - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Chris Browne
Subject Sun Involvements (was Re: [GENERAL] Oracle buys Innobase)
Date
Msg-id 608xx3k1r9.fsf_-_@dba2.int.libertyrms.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] Oracle buys Innobase  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-advocacy
josh@agliodbs.com (Josh Berkus) writes:

> Bruce, Aly,
>
>> >      Hopefully that should make PostgreSQL shine even more. Maybe we
>> > may also see some @sun.com contributers, okay that maybe wishful
>> > thinking.
>>
>> I have seen @sun.com posters already, so it has started.
>
> Actually, the Sun folks have been contributing indirectly for a
> while, and are working on getting Solaris binary packaging
> organized.  They're just not big on joining mailing lists, something
> we need to educate them on.

I remember hearing some talk about DTRACE efforts; I hope that is
proceeding, as it has the potential to be really generally useful
(even for non-Solaris platforms).

Solaris is one of the platforms which hasn't been quite ideal for
PostgreSQL (in comparison with, say, Linux) as it prefers threading to
forking (which doubtless links to the Java thing about threading...).
Improving PostgreSQL performance on Solaris would be no bad thing, as
that would add some useful choices in view of the gradual "dying off"
of Big Iron Unix platforms (SGI comes particularly to mind, and HP
looks to have been distracted by the Itanium thing...)
--
output = ("cbbrowne" "@" "cbbrowne.com")
http://cbbrowne.com/info/wp.html
"Feel free to  contact me (flames about my english  and the useless of
this driver will be redirected to /dev/null, oh no, it's full...)"
-- Michael Beck, describing the PC-speaker sound device

pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Oracle buys Innobase
Next
From: Mitch Pirtle
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Oracle buys Innobase