Re: Planning for improved versions of IN/NOT IN - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Planning for improved versions of IN/NOT IN
Date
Msg-id 605.1038455986@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Planning for improved versions of IN/NOT IN  ("Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> writes:
> What about in the case of a scalar subquery eg. SELECT x IN
> (1,2,3,4,54,56,6), when there maybe hundreds of scalars?

Unrelated to my present problem.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: nested transactions
Next
From: Prasanna Phadke
Date:
Subject: How shall I start postgres on NT