Re: 64-bit API for large object - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: 64-bit API for large object
Date
Msg-id 6047.1348237857@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 64-bit API for large object  (Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>)
Responses Re: 64-bit API for large object  (Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp> writes:
> My preference is nothing are changed both pg_getmsgint64() of the backend
> and routines under PQfn() of the libpq. Isn't it unavailable to deliver int64-
> value "after" the endian translation on the caller side?

Right.  If we had to change anything on the backend side, it would mean
we had a wire protocol change, which is even less acceptable than a
libpq ABI change.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_reorg in core?
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Properly set relpersistence for fake relcache entries.