Re: Why Wal_buffer is 64KB - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Why Wal_buffer is 64KB
Date
Msg-id 603c8f071003300743q4a63ebf4t514c27e067500939@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Why Wal_buffer is 64KB  (Tadipathri Raghu <traghu.dba@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-performance
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 2:00 AM, Tadipathri Raghu <traghu.dba@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have noticed one more thing here, that if you turn off the fsync and try
> to run the transaction than its breaking the currnet filenode and generating
> another filenode. Is it true that whenever you turn off or on the fsync the
> filenode will break and create one more on that table.

I don't know what you mean by a filenode.  Changing the fsync
parameter doesn't cause any additional files to be created or written.

...Robert

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Andy Colson
Date:
Subject: Re: REINDEXing database-wide daily
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: why does swap not recover?