Re: enable_joinremoval - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: enable_joinremoval
Date
Msg-id 603c8f071003291257i4964b1cn4531e70a6a3e0a47@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: enable_joinremoval  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: enable_joinremoval
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
>> On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 13:31 -0600, Alex Hunsaker wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 12:17, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>>>> You're not addressing the original point. I have been asked how would
>>>> users know which tables have been removed and whether there is a way of
>>>> checking that.
>>>
>>> Uhh... they wont be in the explain output...  Seems simple enough.
>
>> That is exactly what I replied, though nobody felt that was a great
>> answer.
>
> Who complained about that exactly?  It seems like a perfectly
> appropriate answer to me.

Jaime Casanova.

...Robert


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: enable_joinremoval
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Parallel pg_dump for 9.1