Re: Proposal: Add JSON support - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Proposal: Add JSON support
Date
Msg-id 603c8f071003281733t5fb767d0pdd6c84d39f435b1d@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Proposal: Add JSON support  (Mike Rylander <mrylander@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Proposal: Add JSON support
Re: Proposal: Add JSON support
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 8:23 PM, Mike Rylander <mrylander@gmail.com> wrote:
> In practice, every parser/serializer I've used (including the one I
> helped write) allows (and, often, forces) any non-ASCII character to
> be encoded as \u followed by a string of four hex digits.

Is it correct to say that the only feasible place where non-ASCII
characters can be used is within string constants?  If so, it might be
reasonable to disallow characters with the high-bit set unless the
server encoding is one of the flavors of Unicode of which the spec
approves.  I'm tempted to think that when the server encoding is
Unicode we really ought to allow Unicode characters natively, because
turning a long string of two-byte wide chars into a long string of
six-byte wide chars sounds pretty evil from a performance point of
view.

...Robert


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Mike Rylander
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal: Add JSON support
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal: Add JSON support