Re: Getting to beta1 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Getting to beta1
Date
Msg-id 603c8f071003151740t60b8d1d4q1c2ce9ab77585127@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Getting to beta1  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> We can easily create another alpha by April 3.  I think the big question
> is whether we can put out beta1 while we still have open HS/SR issues.
> My guess is no.  My other guess is that we will still have open HS/SR
> issues on April 3.  So, putting those two guesses together, we will
> create a new alpha by April 3 for you.  :-|

I think we need to do a better job defining exactly what we think the
"must fix" HS/SR issues are.  Otherwise I can see this process of
trying to get to beta dragging out almost indefinitely.

...Robert


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Should we throw error when converting a nonexistent/ambiguous timestamp?
Next
From: Takahiro Itagaki
Date:
Subject: Re: Ragged latency log data in multi-threaded pgbench