On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 7:53 AM, Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 4:33 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> It's really not much different from a function call with subplans as
>> functions.
>
> Perhaps it would be clearer to display the "(Subplan 1)" in a function
> call style format like Subplan1(b.oid)
I thought about that, too... maybe for 9.1 we should consider it. It
might be nice to add some sort of glyph to make the user less likely
to think that Subplan1 is in fact a function. <Subplan1>(b.oid)?
${Subplan1}(b.oid)? I dunno.
...Robert
