Re: Patch: Remove gcc dependency in definition of inline functions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Patch: Remove gcc dependency in definition of inline functions
Date
Msg-id 603c8f071002121836n412cb067qb84c6992b3eda563@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Patch: Remove gcc dependency in definition of inline functions  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 9:35 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 5:53 PM, Kurt Harriman <harriman@acm.org> wrote:
>>> Revised patch is attached (4th edition).
>
>> This looks generally sane to me, though it seems entirely imaginable
>> that it might break something, somewhere, for somebody... in which
>> case I suppose we'll adjust as needed.
>
> Looks sane to me too -- committed.  We'll soon see what the buildfarm
> thinks (though the number of non-gcc buildfarm members is depressingly
> small).

I can't feel bad about the near-ubiquity of gcc...  life would be a
lot harder if it were otherwise.

...Robert


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch: Remove gcc dependency in definition of inline functions
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: knngist patch support