Re: [CFReview] Red-Black Tree - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: [CFReview] Red-Black Tree
Date
Msg-id 603c8f071002031321k44524c5ds62075530fe4e448e@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [CFReview] Red-Black Tree  (Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su>)
Responses Re: [CFReview] Red-Black Tree
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su> wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Feb 2010, Robert Haas wrote:
>
>>> Robert, Mark described the test he did
>>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-01/msg02927.php
>>
>> So why did he get totally different answers than you?
>
> Because I did tests with 8.3 and HEAD+rbtree, while Mark compared
> HEAD and HEAD+rbtree. Also, my HEAD and his HEAD are very different :)
> I will not mention, that we used totally different setup.
>
>>
>> It's not enough to say "somebody else did a test and got better
>> numbers than we did, so let's use theirs".
>
> I'll repeat my tests with current CVS HEAD.

OK... can you post the exact queries that you are used for the
previous round of testing?

...Robert


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Oleg Bartunov
Date:
Subject: Re: [CFReview] Red-Black Tree
Next
From: Nathan Wagner
Date:
Subject: Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings