Re: warn in plperl logs as... NOTICE?? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: warn in plperl logs as... NOTICE??
Date
Msg-id 603c8f071001220638j5d5ae0f4r187837673198cb9d@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: warn in plperl logs as... NOTICE??  (Alexey Klyukin <alexk@waki.ru>)
Responses Re: warn in plperl logs as... NOTICE??  (Alexey Klyukin <alexk@waki.ru>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 9:13 AM, Alexey Klyukin <alexk@waki.ru> wrote:
> I think elog(WARNING) is less surprising for the end-user, unless there's an objection strong enough to include it
intothe documentation :)
 

I think the main possible objection would what Simon just wrote on the
other thread - that it's been this way for a while, and while someone
might think that a different decision about how to handle it would
have been better, there may be people counting on the current behavior
who will have to spend time and perhaps money making changes if we
change it.

...Robert


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: Standby server lagging behind
Next
From: "Greg Sabino Mullane"
Date:
Subject: Re: warn in plperl logs as... NOTICE??