On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 3:20 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-09-20 at 22:54 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> It seems like there is some support for what this patch is trying to
>> do, but much disagreement about the details of how to get there.
>> Where do we go from here?
>
> I think the next step would be to outline what changes would be
> necessary in pg_ctl to implement LSB behavior. And then decide case by
> case whether it should become the default, an option, or is not
> appropriate for pg_ctl.
>
> Kevin apparently sort of agreed to do that when he came back.
Given the lack of progress here, I'm going to move this one to
"Returned with Feedback" for now. I think Kevin is busy with his
non-PostgreSQL life, and there's always next CommitFest.
...Robert
