Re: Synch Rep for CommitFest 2009-07 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Synch Rep for CommitFest 2009-07
Date
Msg-id 603c8f070907150415v46a0afc3l53ed6a166fbabc1d@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Synch Rep for CommitFest 2009-07  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Synch Rep for CommitFest 2009-07
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 12:32 AM, Fujii Masao<masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
> If the above is OK, should I update the patch ASAP? or
> suspend that update until many other comments arrive?
> I'm concerned that frequent small updating interferes with
> a review.

I decided (perhaps foolishly), to assign reviewers for the two smaller
patches that you extracted from this first, and to hold off on
assigning a reviewer for the main patch until those reviews were
completed:

http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/3f0b79eb0907022341m1d36a841x19c3e2a5a6906b5b@mail.gmail.com
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/3f0b79eb0907030037g515f3337o9092279c62348dc@mail.gmail.com

So I think you should update ASAP in this case.  As soon as we get
some reviewers freed up from the initial reviewing round, I will
assign one or more reviewers to the main Sync Rep patch.

...Robert


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: CommitFest 2009-07 is Now Closed
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Filtering dictionaries support and unaccent dictionary