Re: from_collapse_limit vs. geqo_threshold - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: from_collapse_limit vs. geqo_threshold
Date
Msg-id 603c8f070906012046t5d741cflceda8b513f4a5d67@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: from_collapse_limit vs. geqo_threshold  (Selena Deckelmann <selena@endpoint.com>)
Responses Re: from_collapse_limit vs. geqo_threshold  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 3:34 PM, Selena Deckelmann <selena@endpoint.com> wrote:
> In the spirit of helping wrap-up 8.4 todo items...
> Robert Haas wrote:
>> For 8.4, I'd be happy to just improve the documentation.  I think this
>> sentence could just be deleted from the section on
>> from_collapse_limit:
> My vote would be to provide some information.
>
> Suggested revision of Robert's prose:
>
> Because genetic query optimization may be triggered, increasing
> from_collapse_limit should be considered relative to <xref
> linkend="guc-geqo-threshold">.

Here's my attempt.

...Robert

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Ron Mayer
Date:
Subject: Re: explain analyze rows=%.0f
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: It's June 1; do you know where your release is?