Home > mailing lists

Re: pg_class and enum types - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From	Robert Haas
Subject	Re: pg_class and enum types
Date	May 24, 2009 20:58:11
Msg-id	603c8f070905241358v58ac2686y8f0cf6b6ecc76d20@mail.gmail.com Whole thread Raw
In response to	pg_class and enum types (Gevik Babakhani <pgdev@xs4all.nl>)
Responses	Re: pg_class and enum types (Gevik Babakhani <pgdev@xs4all.nl>)
List	pgsql-hackers

Tree view

On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 4:37 PM, Gevik Babakhani <pgdev@xs4all.nl> wrote:
> I was wondering why there is no pg_class record for the enum types. Do we
> treat the enum types differently?

Because types are stored in pg_type, not pg_class?

...Robert

pgsql-hackers by date:

From: Gevik Babakhani
Date: 24 May 2009, 20:37:34
Subject: pg_class and enum types

From: Tom Lane
Date: 24 May 2009, 21:01:28
Subject: Re: generic options for explain

Re: pg_class and enum types - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

Previous

Next