Re: Prepared transactions vs novice DBAs, again - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Prepared transactions vs novice DBAs, again
Date
Msg-id 603c8f070904221415p58f01ec8t45d7d34f934941bf@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Prepared transactions vs novice DBAs, again  (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: Prepared transactions vs novice DBAs, again  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>> Does a prepared xact still block vacuum cleanup in HEAD, or has that
>> been fixed since 8.2?
>
> It still does. A prepared xact is just like a idle-in-transaction backend as
> far as vacuum is concerned.

Is that really necessary? It's true that you can't vacuum away any
rows whose xmin is that of the prepared xact, but it seems like you
wouldn't need to keep rows just because they were *visible* to the
prepared xact.  Once prepared, it's no longer capable of reading them.

...Robert


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Prepared transactions vs novice DBAs, again
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Prepared transactions vs novice DBAs, again