On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 10:13 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
>> > Maybe the best we are going to do is to have any pattern supplied to \d*
>> > assume 'S' (include system objects). ?I actually have a patch that does
>> > that, attached. (It is from January so might need adjustment.)
>>
>> That still has the problem that "\df a*" is horribly inconsistent with
>> "\df". It might be reasonable to assume that if a name without
>> wildcards is given to any \d command, it should display whatever
>> object it finds, user or system - but I can't see doing it for any
>> wildcard at all.
>
> I think you are re-iterating the URL I referenced when I started this
> thread:
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-01/msg01443.php
>
> I think the big question is whether the inconsistency (pattern implies
> 'S') is worth accepting for greater usability.
The inconsistency would be less objectionable if there were a way to
override it when it's not what you want.
...Robert
