On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 9:27 PM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
> Robert,
>
> * Robert Haas (robertmhaas@gmail.com) wrote:
>> pg_security (which I really think out to be renamed to
>> pg_selinux_context or something, and make a new table if we someday
>> support Trusted Solaris or whatever).
>
> Err, this doesn't really make sense if we're doing row-level security,
> that's not something which is tied to SELinux or Trusted Solaris. Of
> course, it's likely we'll need such a pg_selinux_context table or
> something too.. Or maybe pg_security can be pg_rls instead. Just
> wanted to avoid confusion over this point.. Assuming Peter's approach
> is the path that is generally agreed upon by core..
I don't think there's anything about pg_security that is specific to
row-level security.
...Robert
