Re: Pluggable Indexes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Pluggable Indexes
Date
Msg-id 603c8f070901220820t222f46tb68556e7b295ec15@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Pluggable Indexes  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: Pluggable Indexes  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> Of course, there's no much point in an index that's easily corrupted, so
> I understand the desire to implement WAL too -- I'm just pointing out
> that concurrency could have been developed independently.

Anything's possible with enough work, but having good support in -core
makes it easier and -core has usually been receptive to requests for
such things - for example, I think Tom put in quite a bit of work to
getting the right hooks in to enable libpqtypes.

...Robert


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Albe Laurenz"
Date:
Subject: problem with archive_command as suggested by documentation
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Pluggable Indexes (was Re: rmgr hooks (v2))