> If it came down to this, then I'd say rip it out. Naming log files by epoch
> isn't exactly a user-friendly practice anyway, and there are equivalent but
> more readable formatting options available.
There are other alternatives but they're all ugly. For example, we
could make %0 (or some sequence that isn't taken) evaluate to the
empty string, or we could add another GUC to control the
interpretation of this GUC. But I don't think the ugliness is
justified in this instance.
...Robert
