> 2009/1/10 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
>> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
>>> Uh, is this ready to be applied?
>>
>> I don't think any consensus has been reached on changing this behavior.
>
> I thing, so this is bug - RETURN QUERY has to supply FOR SELECT LOOP
> RETURN NEXT pattern.
>
> My first patch expected so RETURN QUERY is final statement, so I don't
> solve FOUND variable, but Heikki changed this behave.
>
> Without correct FOUND behave we can't to use RETURN QUERY for following pattern
>
> RETURN QUERY some;
> IF FOUND THEN RETURN; END IF;
> RETURN QUERY some_other;
> RETURN;
+1. I can't imagine it's good for this to be randomly inconsistent.
...Robert
