OK, I'll take a look, time permitting.
...Robert
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 3:50 AM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 10:39 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I think that one probably needs review from -core.
>
> -core's role is not quite what you think. We essentially do project
> management. The review I think you're suggesting is from a committer
> (this is a little overlap between those groups of course).
>
>> It's been
>> extensively discussed on -hackers several times already, and is on
>> version 19, so I doubt there are obvious bugs remaining.
>
> It's been discussed, but I don't think anyone has done any actual code
> review though.
>
>> Arguably it could use additional performance testing, though I think
>> Greg has done quite a bit already, but I'm not in a good position to
>> undertake that either for a patch of this type.
>
> I share an office with him, so I can say that yes, he has done a good
> amount of testing (in fact, I don't think people realise just how much
> R&D went into this patch)!
>
> I'd appreciate a code review of it, but if you really don't want to do
> that, please see if you can help Jeff out with the GIN patches.
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
> Dave Page
> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>
