On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 3:24 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
>> Can we call the function "minimal_update_trigger", rather than min_...
>
> "Minimal" really fails to convey the point here IMHO. How about
> something like "suppress_no_op_updates_trigger"?
+1. That's a much better name.
...Robert