Re: Performance: sql functions v. plpgsql v. plperl - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Performance: sql functions v. plpgsql v. plperl
Date
Msg-id 6034.988232631@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Performance: sql functions v. plpgsql v. plperl  (Joel Burton <jburton@scw.org>)
Responses Re: Performance: sql functions v. plpgsql v. plperl
List pgsql-general
Joel Burton <jburton@scw.org> writes:
> couldn't the parse tree be cached from this for each backend?

Yes, if someone wanted to work on it ...

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Joel Burton
Date:
Subject: Re: Performance: sql functions v. plpgsql v. plperl
Next
From: Dale Walker
Date:
Subject: playing with timestamp entries