On Aug 6, 2009, at 15:31 , Josh Trutwin wrote:
> Interestingly, this syntax is accepted in 8.3.7, but SELECT queries
> fail:
>
> CREATE TRIGGER trigger_test_upd_set_last_mod
> BEFORE UPDATE ON test_upd
> FOR EACH ROW EXECUTE PROCEDURE set_last_modified();
>
> Then:
>
> UPDATE test_upd SET foo = 'foo' WHERE id = 1;
> ERROR: operator does not exist: test_upd <> test_upd
> LINE 1: SELECT $1 != $2
> ^
> HINT: No operator matches the given name and argument type(s). You
> might need to add explicit type casts. QUERY: SELECT $1 != $2
> CONTEXT: PL/pgSQL function "set_last_modified_test" line 2 at IF
That's not a SELECT query per se: AIUI it's how the evaluation of the
NEW != OLD expression is evaluated within the PL/pgSQL function as
part of the IF statement (note the "line 2 at IF" context line). It's
just saying the <> operator doesn't exist for the test_upd rowtype.
Michael Glaesemann
grzm seespotcode net