Sorry for delay in my answer.
The problem is that with the lock instructions my app remain in a freeze state. It resembling a MUTEX deadlock.
Anyway, as soon as possible I'll test yuor idea to use a separate PQexec.
Thanks.
Luca.
--------- Original Message --------
Da: "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
To: "Richard Huxton" <dev@archonet.com>
Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Oggetto: Re: [GENERAL] LOCK TABLE HELP
Data: 14/03/08 17:51
> luca.ciciriello@email.it wrote:
> My action are:
>
> void *Execute(void *pParam)
> {
> ........................................
> ........................................
>
> & nbsp; string tableLock = "BEGIN WORK;";
> tableLock.append(" LOCK TABLE ");
> tableLock.append(actorTable);
> tableLock.append(" IN ACCESS EXCLUSIVE MODE;");
> res = PQexec(connection, tableLock.c_str());
> Well, all this doesn't work (the connection is th e always the same in
> all methods and functions). Have I to Lock the table, perform some
> operation on this table, and unlock the table all in the same function
> scope?
What do you mean it doesn't work? How exactly it fails?
If anything, I'd suggest to send the LOCK TABLE in a separate PQexec()
call from BEGIN WORK.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
----
Email.it, the professional e-mail, gratis per te: clicca qui
Sponsor:
Scopri le tue passioni con Leonardo.it!
Clicca qui
