Re: Order changes in PG16 since ICU introduction - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joe Conway
Subject Re: Order changes in PG16 since ICU introduction
Date
Msg-id 5ecb1eec-c115-6de9-8dd4-4bf214b8ebda@joeconway.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Order changes in PG16 since ICU introduction  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
Responses Re: Order changes in PG16 since ICU introduction
List pgsql-hackers
On 6/7/23 19:26, Jeff Davis wrote:
> * What do we do in the case where the environment has LANG=C.UTF-8 (as
> some buildfarm members do)? Is an error acceptable in that case?


If I understand the discussion so far correctly, I think that case 
should fall to the provider.

If it supports "C.UTF-8" explicitly as some distributions do, then use it.

If the provider has no such thing, throw an error.

Somewhere we should document that "C.UTF-8" from the provider might not 
be as stable or working as they expect.

-- 
Joe Conway
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tatsuo Ishii
Date:
Subject: Re: Order changes in PG16 since ICU introduction
Next
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: running logical replication as the subscription owner