Re: 64-bit int (was backend cache...) - Mailing list pgsql-ports

From Thomas G. Lockhart
Subject Re: 64-bit int (was backend cache...)
Date
Msg-id 5ea45248b628aa01878d802e6bbf35b6
Whole thread Raw
List pgsql-ports
> > Can you determine the appropriate character(s) in a printf()
> > specification for int8 on your version of Solaris? We are currently
> > using the HAVE_LONG_INT_64 and HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT_64
<snip>
> This seems to indicate that HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT_64 should be defined...

Yes, it seems that it should be. Please send your src/config.log so we
can see what it determined. You might also check that the libc used for
your little test is the same libc used for Postgres linking, just in
case you are getting a different printf.

                     - Tom

pgsql-ports by date:

Previous
From: herouth maoz
Date:
Subject: Re: [PORTS] Re: [GENERAL] Backend cache invalidation initialization failed... HUH?
Next
From: "Pedro J. Lobo"
Date:
Subject: Bug fix for src/backend/ports/snprintf.c sent to the patches list