Re: Missing mention of autovacuum_work_mem - Mailing list pgsql-docs

From Euler Taveira
Subject Re: Missing mention of autovacuum_work_mem
Date
Msg-id 5e51539f-e4b6-4b46-b995-23a2c17252e8@www.fastmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Missing mention of autovacuum_work_mem  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: Missing mention of autovacuum_work_mem  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-docs
On Thu, Sep 23, 2021, at 7:18 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 10:48:37AM +0200, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> Thanks, and +1 from me.

maintenance_work_mem would be used in the context of autovacuum if
autovacuum_work_mem is -1, but it seems to me that the suggested
wording sounds like only autovacuum_work_mem is used and that it would
never fall back to maintenance_work_mem, no?  I would suggest the
addition of "if specified" in the new part within parenthesis

Good point. However, I prefer "if set".


--
Euler Taveira

Attachment

pgsql-docs by date:

Previous
From: Erwin Brandstetter
Date:
Subject: Re: Typo in release notes for pg14
Next
From: rir
Date:
Subject: create event trigger docs