Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Douglas McNaught
Subject Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL
Date
Msg-id 5ded07e00805290848v4a539d15v67d2b57afe8f797e@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL  ("Dave Page" <dpage@pgadmin.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:

> The only question I have is... what does this give us that PITR doesn't
> give us?

I think the idea is that WAL records would be shipped (possibly via
socket) and applied as they're generated, rather than on a
file-by-file basis.  At least that's what "real-time" implies to me...

-Doug


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Fetter
Date:
Subject: Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL
Next
From: Greg Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Memory question on win32 systems