On 4/4/22 17:26, Tom Lane wrote:
> Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com> writes:
>> [ v15 patch ]
> Thanks. As I'm working through this, I'm kind of inclined to drop
> the has_parameter_privilege() variants that take an OID as object
> identifier. This gets back to the fact that I don't think
> pg_parameter_acl OIDs have any outside use; we wouldn't even have
> them except that we need a way to track their role dependencies
> in pg_shdepend. AFAICS users will only ever be interested in
> looking up a GUC by name. Any objections?
Not from me
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
