Re: Oracle buys Innobase - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Greg Sabino Mullane
Subject Re: Oracle buys Innobase
Date
Msg-id 5d6f6f93d91674f9aaa6c6b83cf0d25b@biglumber.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Oracle buys Innobase  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>)
Responses Re: Oracle buys Innobase  (Dan Armbrust <daniel.armbrust.list@gmail.com>)
Re: Oracle buys Innobase  (Mitch Pirtle <mitch.pirtle@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


> Stupid question, but what does MySQL bring to the equation?  Why
> not just use PostgreSQL in the first place?

A good question. I think one answer is the MySQL name. Many open-source
advocates seem enamored of MySQL, but you can never pin them down about
exactly what it is they love so much about it. Maybe we can rebrand
PG as "MiSQL" or something. :)

The other answer may be the license: plugging PG into the MySQL system
(which is about as technically feasible trying to breed a porpoise
and an elephant) keeps MySQL GPL, which is another reason many people
like it.

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200510101028
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iD8DBQFDSnrqvJuQZxSWSsgRAj7lAJ96I0TGpeOTFSkR91J8FLLIjU2ekgCgsM7C
DfI6bse1MVYUVrW9uGl69hM=
=ose4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Sim Zacks"
Date:
Subject: strange error
Next
From: David Pradier
Date:
Subject: Is a primary key made of a couple columns so much better than a unique() constraint ?