Re: Needs Suggestion - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From subham@cse.iitb.ac.in
Subject Re: Needs Suggestion
Date
Msg-id 5bd97b9da99ae65a7607d116494c70f6.squirrel@www.cse.iitb.ac.in
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Needs Suggestion  (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
So, Can I increase the stack depth limit to a large value ?


> On 22/09/10 12:03, subham@cse.iitb.ac.in wrote:
>> Actually, I used palloc() to set the stack base address.
>> And I am trying to create only a single thread, then also it is causing
>> problem.
>> Actually, I created all the data-structures using palloc(), then I am
>> passing these to the child thread. Even if I make these variables global
>> then also it is not working.
>> But if I don't set its stack address then it is working. But I need to
>> do
>> that because when my thread body is big then it is causing stack fault.
>> So if I cannot set its stack address then Can I increase the stack depth
>> limit to a large value ?
>
> It's not clear what you're trying to do, but it's just not going to
> work. The backend code is not thread-safe, so you can't safely create
> any threads in server code. Not even a single one. And even if you
> could, you should not mess with stack base addresses.
>
> --
>    Heikki Linnakangas
>    EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com
>


-- 

Thank You,
Subham Roy.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: subham@cse.iitb.ac.in
Date:
Subject: Re: Needs Suggestion
Next
From: tkbysh2000@yahoo.co.jp
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #5661: The character encoding in logfile is confusing.