Re: [HACKERS] objsubid vs subobjid - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [HACKERS] objsubid vs subobjid
Date
Msg-id 5b7c6f27-4131-898f-328f-f2b71cfbe80c@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] objsubid vs subobjid  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 3/5/17 16:10, Jim Nasby wrote:
> BTW, did you backpatch as well? The function was added in 9.5. 
> Presumably we wouldn't normally do that, but if we think this is unused 
> enough maybe it's worth it.

It's a catalog change, so we can't backpatch it.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Change in "policy" on dump ordering?
Next
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Allow vacuums to report oldestxmin