Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round4 - compilation issues on RHEL 7.2 - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Adrian Klaver
Subject Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round4 - compilation issues on RHEL 7.2
Date
Msg-id 5b38cdac-d072-ccdd-6d06-695137ce7482@aklaver.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round4 - compilation issues on RHEL 7.2  (Martin Goodson <kaemaril@googlemail.com>)
Responses Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round4 - compilation issues on RHEL 7.2
List pgsql-general
On 05/16/2017 08:39 AM, Martin Goodson wrote:
> On 16/05/2017 15:58, Adrian Klaver wrote:
>> For completeness what does:
>>
>> ls -al /usr/lib64/libssl.so
>>
>> show?
>>
> (Trimming things down a bit to keep things a little bit more readable,
> now we've got the package dependencies issue sorted. Hopefully.
>
>   Hope that's OK?)

See this recent thread for why this is OK and recommended:

https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA%2BbJJbyutGGOKN-wiBDeLrNU-oB%3D_-81xEnfXRcY0wo%2BZRKvZw%40mail.gmail.com


>
> I can see the following:
>
> $ ls -l /usr/lib64/libssl.so
>
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 May 15 16:57 /usr/lib64/libssl.so ->
> libssl.so.1.0.1e
>

Seems okay to me.

>
> OK, thank you. I'll pass that along to our UNIX team and ask for that to
> be installed, see what we get ...

I see from subsequent post that this did not work.

Per Tom's suggestion try

ldd /db_demo/app/postgres/9.6.2-3/lib/libldap_r-2.4.so.2



>
> Regards,
>
> Martin.


--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] EnterpriseDB installed PostgreSQL 9.6 vs. REPMGR. Round 4 - compilation issues on RHEL 7.2
Next
From: Sandeep Gupta
Date:
Subject: [GENERAL] sorry, too many clients already error