Re: JIT works only partially with meson build? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Laurenz Albe
Subject Re: JIT works only partially with meson build?
Date
Msg-id 5a88920da32b910fac64608980d8fe690a14d7d7.camel@cybertec.at
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: JIT works only partially with meson build?  (Yugo Nagata <nagata@sraoss.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 2025-09-30 at 22:31 +0900, Yugo Nagata wrote:
> > You used the <option> tag, which I believe is correct, but the surrounding
> > code uses <literal>.  I don't think it renders differently, but I think it
> > would be good to use the same tag.  I suggest that you change the
> > surrounding code to use <option> as well.
>
> Agreed. I fixed it to use <option>, as well as in other place where I think
> <option> is appropriate. Please find the attached patch.

I'll mark it "eeady for committer".  A committer can decide whether to apply
this to HEAD or not.  I probably would, and revert it if PostgreSQL + Meson +
Windows learns to produce bitcode.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix pg_rewind false positives caused by shutdown-only WAL
Next
From: Daniil Davydov
Date:
Subject: Re: Prevent internal error at concurrent CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION